Thank you for watching! In the face of unrelenting disinformation and authoritarian actions, clear truth-telling and independent media are a necessity. If you value pro-democracy journalism, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber to my newsletter. Paid subscribers empower this work and gain access to exclusive benefits. Your support makes a difference.
$2.2 billion in personal income for Trump last year. Over 3,700 stock trades in a single quarter. A $620 million defense contract that landed in the hands of a company with ties to Donald Trump Jr., right as Trump’s Iran War started generating profits. These are the kinds of numbers Danielle Moodie and I found ourselves rattling off to each other in today’s Substack Live, and by the time we reached the end of the hour, the throughline connecting all of it, from a Senate campaign collapsing under its own weight to a Black teenager who died under circumstances that still don’t add up, was impossible to look away from.
We opened with breaking news. Senator Bernie Sanders had just told Graham Platner directly to drop out of the Maine Senate race, hours after a new and credible sexual assault allegation from a former partner sent his campaign into freefall. Danielle and I found ourselves in total alignment here. Neither of us had ever been on board with him, for reasons that predated this allegation by months, and we walked through why the vetting failure around his campaign says something bigger about how Democrats are learning the difference between moving beyond cancel culture and ignoring red flags.
From there, we went to the story I think about more than almost any other right now, the sheer scale of the Trump family grift. I came in with numbers. Danielle came in with more numbers, plus the receipts for where the money is actually landing. Together we tried to trace the throughline from a president personally profiting off crypto and foreign governments to the price you’re paying at the pump, and from there into the bigger structural question underneath all of it: an economy that has been quietly redesigned over decades to serve the richest among us rather than the people actually doing the work.
We closed on something heavier. We talked about the death of Nolan Xavier Wells, an 18-year-old who went missing over the Fourth of July weekend in Mississippi while on a boat trip with an all-white friend group, and whose body has now been found. We walked through what doesn’t add up about the timeline, what the reporting has surfaced, and why this story sits inside a pattern that Black families know intimately. I’ll be honest, this one hit different for me as a brand-new father, and Danielle helped me think through some of that in real time.
I appreciate those of you who tuned in live and contributed so much to the conversation. This is truly the best community on Substack. If you’re just catching it now, feel free to leave your thoughts in the comments.
You can watch our full conversation above and read key takeaways below. And, as always, thank you for supporting independent media.
If you like my pro-democracy journalism, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber
The Platner Reckoning
Bernie Sanders’ call for Graham Platner to withdraw broke just before we went live, and neither Danielle nor I needed convincing that it was the right call. We were both skeptical from day one and used this opportunity to discuss the deeper lesson for Democrats moving forward.
Danielle was never sold on him to begin with. She made clear she wasn’t one of the people reflexively defending Platner as allegations piled up over the course of his campaign, describing him as a flawed candidate carrying far too much baggage even before this latest and most serious allegation surfaced. She pushed back hard on anyone using Donald Trump’s own conduct as a reason to excuse Platner’s, calling that logic wild on its face, and landed on a phrase that stuck with me all show: that he’d become a candidate of distraction rather than one of direction.
My skepticism traces back to a single Reddit answer. Long before this scandal, I pointed to Platner’s early media appearance with Tommy Vietor, where he apologized for a string of old Reddit posts but conspicuously stood by his “Black people don’t tip” line. I read that as a tell, a candidate making a political calculation about whose voters he could afford to offend, and I’ve carried that distrust since day one.
The vetting process itself is the bigger scandal. Danielle walked through how quickly his support evaporated once the story broke, with Senators, the Working Families Party, and Bernie himself pulling back within a day, and asked pointedly what kind of background check produces a candidate who needed that much walking back. She was clear that she understands the Democratic establishment has treated progressive candidates unfairly before, but said Platner was not the hill she’d have chosen to defend given everything already in his record.
The “regular guy” defense doesn’t survive contact with the facts. I pushed back on the idea that Platner’s rough edges were simply evidence of authenticity, noting that I don’t personally know many regular working people with a Nazi tattoo. I contrasted Platner with other candidates who came from working class or non-traditional backgrounds without anything close to this kind of baggage, arguing that authenticity was never actually the issue.
The timing of the allegation only adds to its credibility. Both of us noted that accuser Jenny Racicot had reportedly wrestled with the political consequences of coming forward as a Democrat who wants to see Susan Collins defeated, and came forward anyway. I pointed out that Platner’s own response, disputing the accuracy of the reporting without directly addressing the substance of the allegation, read as an admission in itself.
What comes next matters more than what just happened. With Maine’s July 13 withdrawal deadline approaching and a July 27 deadline to name a replacement, I flagged that state senator Troy Jackson has emerged as a possible alternative and was already polling ahead of Collins in at least one survey. Danielle’s closing point was simple, that Maine deserves a candidate the state doesn’t have to make excuses for, someone who clears a bar that should never have been this low.
The Grift Playing In Our Faces
This is the section where the conversation really opened up. I came in ready to lay out the scale of what’s happening, and Danielle matched it with detail after detail, until the two of us were essentially building a single, damning case together in real time.
The topline numbers are staggering on their own. I laid out that Trump reported more than $2.2 billion in personal income last year, with $1.4 billion of that coming from crypto alone, alongside more than 3,700 stock trades in a single quarter. I connected this directly to conflicts of interest, noting Trump holds investments in defense contractors while waging a war that benefits them, and holds Nvidia stock while simultaneously greenlighting chip sales to China.
The Pentagon contract is a crystal-clear example of self-dealing. I pointed to a $620 million Pentagon contract awarded to a company with ties to Trump Jr. and no real defense industry background, awarded in the middle of a war that stands to benefit that same company. I outlined this alongside the reported $2 billion in Abu Dhabi-linked funds that flowed into the Trump family’s World Liberty Financial stablecoin venture as evidence of a president actively converting foreign and domestic policy into personal income.
Danielle came in with the receipts on where else the money is moving. She referenced a list she had laid out for her own show the day before, cataloging government contracts and business deals benefiting companies tied to Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, and noted the irony of Hunter Biden becoming an unlikely and effective messenger on the subject after years of Republican investigations into his own finances turned up comparatively little. She also flagged reported trading activity tied to oil markets around the Iran strikes, describing a pattern of enormous trades landing right before major announcements, over and over again.
Treasury Secretary Bessent’s denial only made it worse. Danielle didn’t hold back on Bessent’s public claim that there’s no appearance of any impropriety, calling that response willful blindness. She tied it to the broader posture of an administration that isn’t even bothering to hide what it’s doing, pointing to a $14 million no-bid contract tied to the National Mall reflecting pool as a small but telling example of money being spent carelessly while paint peels and basic maintenance goes undone.
Danielle’s warning was about where this leads if nothing changes. She described an administration that is playing in the public’s face and said plainly that by the time this is over, the country risks looking more dilapidated than the authoritarian regimes it likes to compare itself favorably against. That line landed as the center of this whole section.
I connected the grift directly to people’s pocketbooks. I argued the real story isn’t just that Trump is enriching himself; it’s that he’s doing so while personally driving up costs for everyone else, through tariffs he chose to impose and a war with Iran he entered without congressional approval. I noted that the closing of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil and a significant share of fertilizer supply travels, has already added real costs to American households, and called Trump the personification of a K-shaped economy where the wealthy pull further ahead while everyone else falls behind.
If you like my pro-democracy journalism, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber
The Economy We Deserve
This was the section that ran the longest, and for good reason. What started as outrage over the grift turned into a genuinely substantive conversation about how we got here, who benefits from keeping working people divided, and what an actual alternative could look like.
I traced a direct line from the Southern Strategy to today. I walked through how the coded racial messaging of the Nixon and Reagan eras, built around phrases like welfare queens despite white Americans making up the largest group of welfare recipients, evolved into blaming immigrants and eventually into Trump discarding the code words altogether. I argued that trickle-down economics never delivered on its promise, with corporate tax cuts flowing into stock buybacks and executive pay rather than wages, and predicted Trump’s approval could sink into the high twenties by the midterms as the consequences become impossible to ignore.
Danielle’s response was that real change requires real pain first. She said she does see pockets of growing awareness, but believes many white Americans still haven’t reckoned with what she called a generational trade: access to whiteness and its privileges in exchange for economic security that has quietly eroded for decades. She also turned the question back on the Democratic establishment, asking what real alternative they’ve actually offered when the same corporate donors, big tech, and big oil fund both parties.
Danielle’s servant-class framing reframed the entire debate. She argued that the real dividing line in this country isn’t between working class and middle class; it’s between the ultra-wealthy and everyone else who has to work for a living, whether that’s a middle manager or someone picking produce. When a commenter in the chat pushed back using a $200,000 salary as a counterexample, she responded directly, walking through what childcare, rent, and basic cost of living actually look like in most major American cities to make the point that even a six-figure salary doesn’t buy escape from that structure.
I extended that framework into a concrete policy vision. I proposed a tax system built around a simple test: if you have to work for your money, you deserve real relief, floating meaningful tax cuts for people making under roughly half a million to a million dollars a year. I also floated a specific idea, taxing the net profits of AI companies to fund a small business loan system modeled on federal student loans, paired with what I described as a New Deal-style economic framework that doesn’t repeat the original New Deal’s exclusion of Black Americans.
Danielle grounded all of it in her own family’s story. She described her grandparents immigrating from Jamaica in 1970 and, without college degrees, being able to buy a home and help put their kids through school by working as a domestic worker and a factory worker. She pointed out that she, with multiple advanced degrees, could not afford to buy that same house today, and connected it to a broader story of retail and service workers in the 1990s who could once afford homes and vacations on wages that now leave people needing public assistance just to get by.
She called the current system exactly what it is, a Ponzi scheme. Danielle argued the economy has been deliberately structured to funnel wealth upward while keeping everyone else fighting over scraps, using racism and misogyny as the tools that keep people from recognizing their shared interests. I picked up that thread and tied it back to the K-shaped economy discussion, arguing that grievance politics exists specifically to redirect anger away from that structure and onto immigrants and communities of color instead.
Danielle closed this section with something close to hope. She said she views Trump’s brazenness as, in a strange way, a gift, because it makes the truth about this country impossible to keep denying to ourselves. She acknowledged a commenter calling the conversation soul-crushing, but argued that robbing people of hope is the entire point of the exercise, and that the outcome from here comes down to one of two paths, either unchecked authoritarian power or a collective American awakening.
What Happened To Nolan Wells
This is the story Danielle wanted to make sure we got to, and it’s the one that stayed with me the longest after we went off air. Eighteen-year-old Nolan Xavier Wells went missing over the Fourth of July weekend on a boat trip in Mississippi with a group of white friends, and his body has since been found. What follows is what doesn’t add up and why this story sits inside a much larger and painfully familiar pattern.
The basic facts already raise serious questions. Danielle said that Wells was the only Black person on a boat trip to a remote island, described as little more than a strip of sand with nowhere to hide or go, and that the group returned home with his phone but without him. She noted that in the time between his disappearance and his body being found, several of the friends’ social media accounts went private, and that there has been a conspicuous absence of the kind of public grief posts you’d expect from close friends after a tragedy like this.
This fits a pattern Danielle says Black families know all too well. She referenced a previous case involving a young Black woman who went missing and was later found murdered after a trip with an all-white friend group, a story that only gained mainstream media attention after sustained pressure on social media. She also raised her own skepticism toward past cases officially ruled suicides by hanging in public, arguing that framing runs contrary to patterns she’s observed within the Black community.
New details are surfacing through social media rather than official channels. Danielle referenced footage shared by attorney Ben Crump showing a fight breaking out on the water near a cluster of boats gathered for the holiday weekend, along with a bystander account placing Wells on the boat around 4:30 p.m. and gone by roughly 7:30 p.m. She also pointed out that a Snapchat video from the area confirmed cell service was working that day, undercutting any suggestion that the group couldn’t have called for help.
I focused on the group’s behavior after Wells went missing. I said leaving the island with a missing friend’s phone rather than staying to search or immediately alerting authorities reads as deeply suspicious on its own, regardless of what ultimately happened. I was careful to say I don’t know whether the friends are guilty of anything, but argued plainly that if the races here were reversed, three Black teenagers in this exact situation would already be under active suspicion, and this story would be dominating Fox News around the clock.
The conversation turned personal for me in a way I didn’t expect. I connected this moment to being roughly Trayvon Martin’s age when Martin was killed, and to watching colleagues at the time defend George Zimmerman in real time, describing that recurring pattern of young Black men targeted, killed, or convicted after defending themselves as something I now have to think about differently as a brand new father to a son who will be both Black and Jewish.
Danielle closed by naming exactly why this work matters to her. She said conversations like this one are the reason she does what she does, describing the Black community’s hypervigilance not as excessive caution but as a survival skill earned the hard way. Her message to parents and caregivers listening was direct: pay close attention to whether the spaces your children move through, and the ones you move through yourself, are actually safe.
If you like my pro-democracy journalism, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber
Bottom Line
Everything we covered this week traces back to the same basic question, who does this country actually protect, and who is left to absorb the cost.
Graham Platner got to run for months on charisma and grievance politics before the truth caught up to him. Donald Trump gets to convert the presidency itself into a personal income stream while working families choose between groceries and gas. An entire economic system has been built, deliberately, to keep people fighting each other over scraps instead of asking why the scraps exist in the first place. And a family in Mississippi is left demanding answers that the system isn’t in any hurry to provide. None of these stories are separate. They’re the same story, told from different angles, about who gets accountability and who gets excuses.
Thank you to Danielle Moodie for another conversation that pushed me to think deeper, and for the work she does every single day. Go subscribe to her at The DAM Digest if you haven’t already. Her voice is one of the sharpest and most honest in independent media.
And if you want to keep supporting work like this, becoming a paid subscriber to Ahmed Baba News is one of the most direct ways to do it. You can do that below. And if you’re already a paid subscriber, thank you! It truly means a lot.
