Thank you for watching! In the face of unrelenting disinformation and authoritarian actions, clear truth-telling and independent media are a necessity. If you value pro-democracy journalism, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber to my newsletter. Paid subscribers empower this work and gain access to exclusive benefits. Your support makes a difference.
Charles Douglas and I came into this Friday show with a lot to discuss. We had news of the day to get through, primaries to dissect, a Platner update to deliver, and somewhere in the middle we landed on a thesis: economic populism is resilient to scandal. By the end, we were debating summer music playlists, which tells you everything you need to know about this community.
We started with Trump’s latest fake Iran War deal moment. We got into the Horace Cooper CNN clip and the broader Black conservative grift machine. We updated the California picture, which has genuinely improved since the initial results came in. We talked about Bernie Sanders as a progressive barometer, with honest critiques attached. And we spent real time on Graham Platner, not to relitigate our conversation from last week, but to land somewhere more useful: what the fact that he won tells us about where the Democratic Party’s energy actually is right now.
I appreciate those of you who tuned in live and contributed so much to the conversation. This is truly the best community on Substack. If you’re just catching it now, feel free to leave your thoughts in the comments.
You can watch our full conversation above and read key takeaways below.
The Iran “Deal” Is A Pump & Dump Scheme
We have been here before. Thirty-eight times before, according to CNN’s count. Trump announced another imminent Iran deal, the details were immediately contradicted by Iran, and by morning Trump was on Truth Social calling Tehran “dishonorable.”
Trump has claimed an imminent Iran deal at least 38 times, and the pattern is not random. Every time one of these announcements drops, someone has already shorted the market by hundreds of millions of dollars, roughly twenty minutes prior. I said this directly, and I will keep saying it until someone with a subpoena takes it seriously: this is insider trading at a scale that is pretty much indisputable at this point. Mainstream financial media has largely accepted that this is happening. What we are waiting for is accountability, and under this administration we are not holding our breath.
The victims of this scheme are not abstract. Charles made this point with real force: the people getting burned are not day traders. They are regular people with 401ks and pension funds watching their retirement accounts get used as a casino while the people running the scheme build bunkers and buy islands. The wealth being extracted is not coming from nowhere. It is coming from us.
Trump owns defense contractors. His sons own drone manufacturers. The Pentagon gave them a $600 million loan. I laid this out plainly: this is not a gray area. The president of the United States is waging a war in which he personally profits from the continuation of hostilities. That is the definition of a conflict of interest at a scale that should be dominating every news cycle.
Even if a deal happens, there is no returning to the previous status quo. I made this argument, and I want it on the record: supply chain shocks are already locked in. Gulf nations have ramped down oil production, and it will take a long time to get that back up to speed. Iran now knows the full extent of its leverage over the global economy with the Strait of Hormuz. A deal does not erase any of that. The damage is done. And we are still paying $450 more per household on energy while people in a Signal chat somewhere get rich off the announcements.
The Black Conservative Grift & Why Demographic Representation Is No Longer Enough
Horace Cooper went on CNN and said, with a straight face, that Trump’s policies are specifically helping Black Americans. He was so convinced of it, he wrote a book about it. Abby Phillip immediately fact-checked him with the Black unemployment data. I quote-tweeted the exchange with a fact-check of my own. Charles and I spent some real time here because the broader issue is worth taking seriously.
The Black conservative grift machine is well-funded, and it will find you. I disclosed something I do not talk about often: I get far more sponsorship requests from right-wing products than left-leaning ones. The money is on the right. The second a Black creator gets any platform, the machine approaches. Candace Owens ran an anti-Trump blog in 2016 before getting swept up. Charlie Kirk’s team approached me in 2022 to fly to Arizona and appear on his show. I declined. I declined because I know what that orbit does to people and I know what my values are. But the financial incentive to go the other way is real, and people should understand that when they see a Horace Cooper on their screen.
Trump’s decade has forced a necessary evolution in how voters think about representation. Charles made this observation clearly: before Trump, representation mattered in a way that stood on its own. Getting someone elected who looked like you and came from a disadvantaged community was a win in itself. That is no longer sufficient. What the Trump era has done, and Charles acknowledged this is a painful clarification, is force voters to interrogate the policies behind the face. Winsome Sears running against Abigail Spanberger in Virginia is the proof of concept. Voters did not back Sears because she was a Black woman. They looked at what she was going to do and chose accordingly. Deb Haaland, on the verge of becoming the first Native American governor, is the counterexample: representation plus substance, which is what the moment demands.
There is no excuse for backing this agenda today, and Charles was direct about that. Ten or twenty years ago, when the debate was tax policy, and it was a different world, maybe you could make a principled argument. Not now. The lines are too clear. You are siding with white nationalist authoritarianism when the evidence is this obvious, and no amount of book deals or cable news appearances changes what that means for the communities you claim to represent.
California Update: Nithya Raman’s Real Shot & The End Of The Career Politician
The initial California results looked one way. The final count looks considerably more interesting. Charles had a lot to say about what actually happened and what it means.
Two-thirds of LA voters did not vote for Karen Bass. Charles made this the headline, and he is right to. Nithya Raman is now in the top two. The MAGA candidate, Spencer Pratt, is eliminated. What looked like an establishment hold is now a genuinely competitive race between an incumbent whose tenure voters have judged harshly on homelessness and the fires, and a candidate aligned with Mamdani, AOC, and Bernie who is talking about reinventing Los Angeles from the ground up. Charles said he was judging LA before this, and he takes it back. I think Raman can win some of the Pratt anti-incumbency vote too, because what those voters wanted was disruption and she is the more credible version of it.
The career politician model is broken, and voters can smell it. I said this on the live, and I will stand by it: there is a specific mold of Democrat that people are exhausted by. It is the person for whom this is their next career step. The person who is just moving up the ladder because it is their turn. That is not a calling. That is a job. What Mamdani has, what Raman has, what the candidates winning these primaries have, is the unmistakable energy of someone who is about the cause before they are about the title. Voters know the difference right now. They are starving for it.
The people who should run are usually the people who need to be talked into it. Charles made the AOC point that landed with me: she said her opponents mistake her for someone seeking a seat, when she is fighting for a cause and will do whatever serves that cause. I made the Obama point: Harry Reid had to walk a newly elected senator into his office and tell him to consider running for president. Obama was reluctant. Michelle did not want him to run. He was pulled to it by the moment and by the people. That is the model. Charles put it simply: the people who do not want power are the ones we want in power, because they will get the job done for the people, not themselves.
The Progressive Bernie Barometer, And An Honest Critique
Charles came into this live wearing a Bernie Sanders shirt, which prompted some teasing, but his underlying point is worth taking seriously. Bernie is batting a thousand on endorsements this cycle, and that is not a coincidence.
Charles claims that Bernie Sanders is the best barometer in American politics for where working-class voters are headed, even if you would not vote for him yourself. Charles made this case plainly: the Montana smoke jumper candidate, Justin Pearson running against a beloved 30-year incumbent in Memphis, Mamdani, all of them controversial picks at the time, all of them winning. Common Power’s own candidate selections have aligned almost exactly with Bernie’s endorsements. You do not have to agree with everything he says. You do not have to think he is the messenger for every issue. But if you want to understand where the energy is, watch where he points, Charles said.
I agree with Bernie being early on the working class message, but my critiques of him are real. I said this on the live, and I mean it: Bernie took too long to respond to the Supreme Court Callais ruling. His broader pattern on systemic racism has frustrated people who are close to him, not just his critics. And his handling of the 2016 rigged-primary narrative, even if I understand what he was getting at, let something loose that I have not forgiven easily. But the critiques of Bernie on race are real, and they come from people inside progressive politics, not just from establishment Democrats trying to discredit him.
The New Deal problem. In my conversation with Jamaal Bowman earlier this week, Bowman was the one to point out that the New Deal left out a lot of Black people in its implementation. That is the history we are working with. What I am seeing now, and Charles agreed, is a genuine convergence where the working class economic message and the racial justice message are blending in ways that are undeniable. You cannot deny that the Trump administration is targeting Black political and economic power simultaneously. That fusion is where the real power of this coalition lives.
Platner Won. The Takeaway: Economic Populism Is Resilient To Scandal
We spent real time here, partly because we spent real time on it last week and people deserve a follow-up, and partly because Charles landed a frame by the end of this conversation that I think is the most important political observation made this episode.
Harm reduction voting is not a compromise. It is a political tradition with deep roots. Charles said this with real weight: Black voters in deep red areas have been making harm reduction decisions for generations. Voting for the least harmful Republican in Indiana or the least hostile candidate in a race they cannot win is not cynicism. It is political survival. Eyes on the prize is a slogan that comes from exactly this tradition. Common Power does not have the privilege to look at the Maine map and say they do not need that seat. Charles challenged anyone sitting in a blue state to go to Maine and tell the people who voted for Platner that they were wrong. That is not politics. That is condescension, according to Charles.
My lane is journalism, and I am committed to staying in it. I was honest about this: you will not find me shilling for Platner on panels. You will not find me going blue MAGA and discrediting the women. But you also will not find me playing false equivalencies. Republicans backing Trump, who has been found liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll, who covered up the Epstein files, who has never apologized for anything in his life, do not get to enter this conversation as moral arbiters. Multiple things can be true at once. The Democratic Party is grappling publicly with a flawed candidate because we have standards. That is not hypocrisy. That is conscience.
The one distinction I will make for Platner is the one that matters most: he apologizes. I said this clearly: the key difference between Platner and Trump is not only the severity of the allegations, but how they reckon with them. Trump has never acknowledged a failing in his life. Platner has apologized, says he has grown, and is owning most of the conduct. That does not make the conduct acceptable. It does not mean I am not still frustrated that he ran knowing what was in his background. But it is a real distinction, and I will not pretend it is not.
The big takeaway: economic populism is resilient to scandal. This is Charles’s frame, and it is the one I want people to leave with. This guy was about as flawed a candidate as you can have on the Democratic side, and he still won because people believe he is fighting for them. That is how powerful the working-class economic message is right now. Charles said it directly: if real economic populist messaging could survive all of this, it has real standing as the predominant platform for the party heading into the general. And then the obligation is to follow through. You say you will improve material conditions. You get in office. You do it. Because if you do not, they will swing back and vote for someone else, and they will be right to.
People are desperate because they are not thriving. Charles closed with this: Things are bad and getting worse. Wealth is concentrating at a pace that has no precedent. Elon Musk just became a trillionaire while people cannot pay their utility bills. That desperation is why voters will ride for whoever they believe has their backs. The candidates who can credibly answer that desperation with a real economic vision will win. That is the whole game.
Bottom Line
The Iran War is a grift, and someone needs to investigate it. The Black conservative machine is well-funded, and we need to call it what it is. California has more life in it than the initial results suggested. Platner won; the people of Maine made their choice, and the lesson is not about him. The lesson is that when people believe you are fighting for their material conditions, they will ride for you through almost anything. Working class politics is the message. Run on it.
If this conversation mattered to you, I hope you consider becoming a paid subscriber to Ahmed Baba News. If you’re already a paid subscriber, thank you! Independent pro-democracy journalism only works if people back it. And if you’d like to get involved and knock doors this election year, I also highly recommend checking out Common Power.
